Teorias sobre la plusvalia

Teorias sobre la plusvalia

🎯 ¿Cansado de los anuncios?
Elimínalos ahora 🚀

«y el que C valga 8 B o 12 B son circunstancias que no implican ninguna diferencia en la capacidad de expresar el valor de A y C en B y, desde luego, en la capacidad de comparar el valor de A y el de C, una vez expresado» (l. c., pp. 104 s.).

But how to express A in B or C? A, B, C must all be considered as something different from what they are as things, products, values in use, to express «them» in each other, or, what comes to the same thing, to treat them as equivalent expressions of the same unity. A = 4 B. Then the value of A is expressed in 4 B, and the value of 4 B in A, so that both sides express the same. They are equivalents. They are both equal expressions of value. It would be the same if they were unequal ones or A > 4 B, A < 4 B. In all these cases they are as far //835/ as they are values, only different or equal in quantity, but always quantities of the same quality. The difficulty is to find this quality.[381]

«La condición necesaria para proceder es reducir a un común denominador las mercancías que se trata de medir»

<por ejemplo, para comparar Δ con todos los demás polígonos, sólo se necesita convertir éstos en Δ, to express them in triangles. But to do this the A and the polygon are in fact supposed as identities, different figurations of the same-space[382]>,


👉 Descargar el audiolibro GRATIS en Amazon
Reportar problema / Sugerencias

eXTReMe Tracker